Do I make you hoooorny? That, madam, is illogical.
Let’s take it old school today, with a flashback to last week’s post about the “Area 51 Love Doll”. (Gosh, a week?—has it been that long?) A certain commenter noted that the National Evil wrote about this doll from a “male perspective.”
In addition to making an enemy for life, said commenter raises a valid point. As the victim of a genetic conspiracy, the National Evil does tend to view things from the prism of his gender. He can’t help his rampaging Y chromosome. But that doesn’t stop him from considering such input and wondering . . .
Pop culture teaches us that the blow-up sex doll—be it in the form of a woman, a vagina-mouthed tri-boobed woman, or a sheep—is a male pursuit. And offhand, I can’t argue (though Catherine the Great was said to be fond of her inflatable horse). But surely there are women out there feverishly pumping life into a plastic Adonis.
So we’ve reluctantly accepted that there are men out there for whom a rosebud-lipped, duo-boobed woman is just not enough. Does that mean there are women out there fantasizing about a, I dunno . . . proboscis-schlonged Alien stud?
The question, Ladies: What would you look for in a male “Area 51 Love Doll”?
The National Evil would appreciate any feedback on this most important of issues.